Mod 2.2 : Interpolation
Learning all the different interpolation methods to take the known values to estimate values of other points gave me a different perspective on how to analyze datasets like elevation, rainfall, chemical concentrations, and water quality. A challenge I found between the different interpolation values in which interpolation method would be best to apply to the different datasets if I had data with fewer sample sites and how to correct them so the data can be better represented. Believe elevation data would be easiest to apply the Spline interpolation method due to the simple data values and best representation in elevation change. Data such as data points of chemical values would be better represented with Thiessen interpolation values.
1. The
difference between two interpolation methods; Spline and IDW (Inverse Distance
Weighted) is that Spline estimates values using a mathematical function that
minimizes overall surface curvature, resulting in a smooth surface that passes
exactly through the input points while IDW assumes that each input point has a
local influence that diminishes with distance. As a result, the Spline appearance
of the interpolated map is like fabric is pulled over the points and the gaps
are naturally filled as opposed to IDW which fills the gaps of all the points
surrounding the area. Spline’s range of elevation is based on the space between
one point to another such as elevation change. IDW has a convergence of data
where they have the same low value.
When implementing DEM or using DEM
data, I believe the Spline interpolation method would be the most similar to
present the DEM data as advantages to Spline method is estimating the minimum
and maximum points and producing a smooth surface data presentation.
IDW |
Spline Regular |
Comments
Post a Comment